Practical guide and verification
Use RSA-PSS parameters as part of the protocol
A signature is not defined only by the RSA key. The hash function, mask-generation behavior and salt-length policy must agree between signer and verifier. Record those choices with the protocol instead of treating a successful local test under one browser default as proof that another system will use the same parameters.
Sign the exact bytes, not the visual appearance
Whitespace, line endings, text encoding and Unicode normalization can change the byte sequence while leaving text looking almost identical. When interoperability matters, define whether the signed input is UTF-8 text, a file digest, canonical JSON or another deterministic representation and reproduce that representation during verification.
Keep private-key handling separate from signature verification
Verification requires only the public key. Avoid moving a private key into systems that only need to verify signatures, and do not paste production private keys into troubleshooting environments unless the security process explicitly permits it. Browser-local processing reduces server exposure but does not make key handling consequence-free.
Distinguish signature validity from signer identity
A valid RSA-PSS signature proves that the supplied public key verifies the supplied message and signature under the selected parameters. It does not prove who owns that public key. Identity normally depends on a certificate, pinned key, authenticated key exchange or another trusted distribution mechanism.
Run a negative verification test
After a successful sign-and-verify round trip, change one character of the message or signature and confirm verification fails. That negative test is a useful integration check because it verifies that the application is actually binding the signature to the intended bytes rather than displaying a stale success state.