Literal substring and whole-word phrase matching are separate
Use literal mode when substrings matter, or switch to segmented whole-word matching when a phrase should match word tokens rather than characters inside larger words.
Paste text and a phrase to count literal occurrences locally without changing the source text.
Counts run locally in your browser. When available, word, sentence, and grapheme segmentation uses the browser’s Unicode-aware Intl.Segmenter; fallback rules are used on older browsers.
Measure literal phrase frequency with density, match positions, overlap policy and nearby context for repeated-phrase auditing.
Start with the broad counter that matches the question, then move to focused frequency, reading-time or syllable analysis. Specialist readability, repetition and writing-goal tools remain available from the full hub.
Use literal mode when substrings matter, or switch to segmented whole-word matching when a phrase should match word tokens rather than characters inside larger words.
Use the tool first, then apply these checks to verify the inputs, interpret the result, and hand it off without displacing the primary workflow.
Exact text, whole-word sequences, punctuation-normalized text, and overlapping matches can produce different counts. Keep case and overlap settings with the result so a later comparison does not attribute a changed count to editing when the matching rule actually changed.
High frequency can indicate boilerplate or awkward repetition, but it can also reflect a product name, legal phrase, technical term, or intentionally repeated instruction. Inspect representative occurrences before rewriting instead of treating every high-count phrase as a defect.
Density comparisons are meaningful only when the analyzed text and tokenization rules are comparable. Removing navigation, references, headings, or quoted material from one draft but not another changes the denominator. Record the text scope when frequency results are used in an editorial review.
Search visibility depends on usefulness, relevance, links, technical accessibility, intent fit, competition, and many other signals. Phrase frequency is a writing diagnostic, not a target percentage or proof of search quality. Prefer clearer copy over mechanical repetition.